Life After the Oil Crash Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 20, 2009, 04:46:05 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
392770 Posts in 22542 Topics by 8192 Members
Latest Member: Doomlicious
* Home Help Search Login Register

+  Life After the Oil Crash Forum
|-+  LATOC Discussion Categories
| |-+  LATOC *Financial* Doom Breaking News and Doomer Asset Protection and Investing
| | |-+  And Just When You Thought Unemployment Charts Couldn't Get Worse
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: And Just When You Thought Unemployment Charts Couldn't Get Worse  (Read 2294 times)
HotRocks
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1491



View Profile WWW
« on: November 08, 2009, 11:59:44 PM »

They do: Even More Unemployment Charts

Logged

MooreTime
Full Member
***
Posts: 160


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2009, 02:32:19 AM »

 Shocked
Logged
Broil
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3906


Retired Vagabond


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2009, 02:37:21 AM »

Awww, that was no fair.  The population's been growing too, so I want to see one with unemployed as a percentage of employable population, not the absolute number.

But it should be the older way of calculating unemployment, not the new one that Clinton or Carter or someone sneaked in on us.  I think it's called U6 now?  It should be at Shadowstats.
Logged

Therefore shall her plagues come in one day: death, mourning and famine; and she shall be utterly burned... And the kings of the earth shall bewail her, standing afar off for the fear of her torment, saying, Alas, alas that great city Babylon, that mighty city! for in one hour is thy judgement come.
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4630


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2009, 02:41:17 AM »

In 1960, US population was about 180 million. It's less than twice that now, the number of long term now is over 5 times that of 1958. Growth since 1975 is only a factor of some 1.5, growth in long term now to then is over 3.5. And so on.  I'd say quite fair.
Logged
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4630


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2009, 02:44:37 AM »

1940 - 132,164,569
1950 - 151,325,798
1960 - 179,323,175
1970 - 203,302,031
1980 - 226,542,199
1990 - 248,709,873
2000 - 281,421,906
2008 estimated was 304,000,000 plus change.
Logged
kenjamkov
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1285


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2009, 05:14:25 PM »

If you look at 1983, the second highest # in the chart, the population was about 234million.  Which means about 1% of the population jobless for more than 27 months.

Compare that to today with a population of about 308 million and a number of 5.6 million in the chart.  1.8% of the population jobless for more than 27months.  That is nearly double the highest number.  What they don't show is pre-1948 numbers.

Just think about that.  More than 3 times the number of standing military personnel are sitting at home because they haven't had a job in 2 years!
Logged

How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
realitycheck
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 304


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2009, 05:27:37 PM »

At ease.
Chart says WEEKS unemployed.
Logged
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4630


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2009, 07:40:43 PM »

What chart are you looking at?
Logged
dwheeler
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1031



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2009, 08:37:59 PM »

At ease.
Chart says WEEKS unemployed.

I was unemployed for 8 months ....  How many weeks have you been?

The difference with what is going on now is people are begging for anything to do in some parts of the country.  There are NO jobs.
Logged
cygnus
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4688


Newly Hatched Dofenist


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 09, 2009, 08:50:28 PM »

Awww, that was no fair.  The population's been growing too, so I want to see one with unemployed as a percentage of employable population, not the absolute number.

Yeah, that would help.  Although I think it's safe to say that the population didn't more than TRIPLE between 2007 and 2009/10.    Wink
Logged

Swallow a toad in the morning and you will encounter nothing more disgusting the rest of the day.
Nicolas de Chamfort
shaleoh2
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2410


oil and gas production will soon decline


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 09, 2009, 08:57:37 PM »

exponential's wait for no one (just  like doom)
« Last Edit: November 09, 2009, 09:32:04 PM by shaleoh2 » Logged

lives and economy are entirely dependent on fossil fuel
((( is this too bold? )))
It would be an enormous oversimplification to say that oil price 'caused' the world recession,
but the fact that the price spike and the economic crisis occurred at the same time is hardly meaningless coincidence.
perdition79
Full Member
***
Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 09, 2009, 09:42:05 PM »

The difference with what is going on now is people are begging for anything to do in some parts of the country.  There are NO jobs.

Spot on. When I'm speaking to human resources folks on the phone, I'll small talk with them after they say they'll keep my application on file should a position open.  These are jobs on the Florida state job website, supposedly vacant, and the HR people say the same thing: they're not hiring, just accepting applications. A couple have stated that their businesses receive tax incentives to list jobs through the state if the possibility exists that they will hire within six months of the posting.

There are no jobs.
Logged

Starve The Beast.
auntiegrav
Newbie
*
Posts: 26


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2009, 09:14:23 AM »

It's ALL bullshit.
First: let's see a chart of how many people produced food vs. how many are now unemployed over the same time period.
Second: Compare how many people are actively engaged in doing USEFUL work that provides FUTURE USEFULNESS instead of just Consumptive Behaviors that use up stored resources.
Third: The reality is that the vast majority of needs are met by a very few people's efforts. "Employment" is irrelevant to the future needs of the planet. Most people could just stay home and be fed and clothed without changing the potentials of humans as contributors/consumers, and in fact, if we sent most "employed" people home with full pay, the planet and economy would be better off. Especially if they 'work' for government, where they spend their time finding ways to justify their paychecks by killing trees and people who don't have so much technology.
Fourth: We have spent the last 100 years replacing human muscles with petroleum. Now, everyone is fat and unemployed. It seems that the best thing we can do is shut down all of the oil wells. When the lack of easy living finally sets in, people can start being useful to each other again, instead of just 'producing' for the banks and governments.
Logged
cz
Guest
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2009, 09:24:32 AM »

Fourth: We have spent the last 100 years replacing human muscles with petroleum. Now, everyone is fat and unemployed. It seems that the best thing we can do is shut down all of the oil wells. When the lack of easy living finally sets in, people can start being useful to each other again, instead of just 'producing' for the banks and governments.

We won't have to shut down anything, 'mother nature' is taking care of that all by herself. Roll Eyes
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!