Folks - serious stuff here, not to be paranoid - regarding posting on the net

[mtlouie]

Hi minxy Linda!!

[Jeromie]

Remember, that the Kahre defendants were not exonerated but simply had a hung jury on all accounts.   The IRS had never provided a ruling on  taxability of Federal Specie because they have a huge problem based on long standing Supreme  Court cases. They have  provided  rulings on taxability of bullion.  Specie and  Bullion are not the same thing.

You can read the conundrum in   7 Ling Su Fan v. U.S.   among other SC cases.    Sovereignty, meaning Congress, may set any value it wishes  for legal tender purposes. If the market value of specie composition exceeding face is taxable so is the loss value of composition  of a Federal   Reserve Note exceeding face deductible  among other things.    

They do have a problem and it must be driving them bonkers.

[houseoftang]

mtlouie, I should have made bets that you'd come back.  I might be a slightly richer man.  Welcome back anyway.

I'm curious why the IRS decided they need the names of folks who commented on the case via the newspaper's website.  I agree with Phildo's analysis as far as the actual case goes, but the point was about the subpoena of the information that really had nothing to do with the case.

[mtlouie]

Hey, tang!!  How's married life?

Here's a little fly for the ointment:  what if the whole thing was set up by "them?"  Keeps anyone thinking of doing something different.....well, thinking and not doing.  Just sayin'.

[Kushtaka]

Welcome back, mtlouie!

[goanna]

So smart people won't be posting threats, lies or anything else potentially harmful. Dummies on the other hand, will be posting all that stuff.

you are pretty confident. Look around in the world or in history, there are so many countries were it is sufficient to publish an opinion to be hung or worse.
The only protection you'll have in the internet is:
- that data like latoc are destroyed (that would be my suggestion to the mods, destroy old posts unless special ones with predictions
-that the internet breaks down at all
- because it is so huge and still might be some work filter the specific data out.

[sunbird]

Oh come on.  I would stand by any statement I've made.  Put me in the docket.  Or is it the dock? 

We've got mtLouie back!!!!!!!!!!!  Bring them on!

[mtlouie]

Welcome back, mtlouie!

Hey!

Sunbird- And we all know how well "Bring them on!" has gone. 

I don't think I've ever said anything I'd take back.  Unless they had me on the rack or were waterboarding me.  Then I'd say anything they wanted me to say...... 

[Bill from Pennsylvania]

mtlouie
YAY!!!
You are back

Yeah, it's about friggin time! 

[Madnsassy]

Anyone who posts on the internet thinking his comments are anonymous is a fool. So smart people won't be posting threats, lies or anything else potentially harmful. Dummies on the other hand, will be posting all that stuff. So let it come as a surprise to them when the FBI/PD/Delta Force/Green Berets/RCMP/MI6 or other members of the alphabet soup gang come to call.

Sabre.

You got that right!  There's a reason they call it the World Wide WEB.  If you can't take it, better not dish it out.  Or, if you don't want to be the fly in the parlor....

Louie, WAHOO!  Missed you!  Seems like home here again.   

[Dangime]

When I see stuff like this I am actually happy.

The reason being is that if real change is ever going to occur in the government, no outside power is just going to rise up and topple it. As far as I am concerned, the government's power base is unassailable, it's their game to lose. To do so, the government must destroy its own legitimacy. It has already done this in many ways, but the more overtly they do so, and the grosser the actual and percieved abuses of power are, then the greater the chances are of J6P moving to the side of real change. To quote the Declaration of Independance roughly, men are more willing to suffer evil than to change traditions they have long held.

In otherwords, the .gov has to be baited into destroying itself. There will be some sacrifices like the poor bastards who got shot at the Boston Massacre. You might read about this court case in some future history book about the events leading up to the Second American Revolution.

[Madnsassy]

Remember, that the Kahre defendants were not exonerated but simply had a hung jury on all accounts.   The IRS had never provided a ruling on  taxability of Federal Specie because they have a huge problem based on long standing Supreme  Court cases. They have  provided  rulings on taxability of bullion.  Specie and  Bullion are not the same thing.

You can read the conundrum in   7 Ling Su Fan v. U.S.   among other SC cases.    Sovereignty, meaning Congress, may set any value it wishes  for legal tender purposes. If the market value of specie composition exceeding face is taxable so is the loss value of composition  of a Federal   Reserve Note exceeding face deductible  among other things.    

They do have a problem and it must be driving them bonkers.

Their real problem is that taxing personal income is unconstitutional.  Oh shit, someone's smashing in my front door. . . .

[notbobdavis]

Their real problem is that taxing personal income is unconstitutional.  Oh shit, someone's smashing in my front door.....

LOL!  Now that was funny!  Oh wait, you were kidding right?   

[roccman]

when ireland collapses and creates a domino effect of global markets melting down...

this won't even register as a fart in the wind.

[Cycling in Hollywood]

LOL- dontcha think a lot of us here are already on some list with one (or more) of the Alphabet agencies.

Of course we are...