Life After the Oil Crash Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 16, 2010, 11:46:34 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
515368 Posts in 29322 Topics by 7533 Members
Latest Member: Tinfoil Hattie
* Home Help Search Login Register

+  Life After the Oil Crash Forum
|-+  LATOC Discussion Categories
| |-+  LATOC *Financial* Doom Breaking News and Doomer Asset Protection and Investing
| | |-+  Evans-Pritchard: The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Evans-Pritchard: The G20 moves the world a step closer to a global currency  (Read 1843 times)
slow_dazzle
Guest
« on: April 03, 2009, 02:47:00 AM »



IMF rising. Will PO make this pointless?

source

In fact, was the summit REALLY about saving the global economy, or did it have another purpose?

source

So what was the purpose of the summit? Any theories? Was it about saving the economy?




« Last Edit: April 08, 2009, 06:00:53 PM by slow_dazzle » Logged
Emeline
Guest
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2009, 04:36:12 AM »

So they looked like they were doing something in between all the tea parties and visits to the Queen?
Logged
slow_dazzle
Guest
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2009, 06:00:54 AM »

So they looked like they were doing something in between all the tea parties and visits to the Queen?

Hehe!

Watch where the IMF money goes - into enterprises that don't use too much energy and push up oil prices? GM isn't going to be rescued despite the huge job losses bankruptcy will entail. Is that because it is fully understood that rescuing the industry will create renewed demand for oil and push prices up? I'm guessing, and probably way off target, but it will be interesting to see where the money goes and what it is used for.
Logged
great769
Guest
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2009, 06:27:32 AM »

  I expected a positive ending to this meeting but I will hold judgement since we got a statement from the world top 20 professional liars that everthing when good.
Tom
Logged
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6987


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2009, 01:30:48 PM »

PO makes any steps aimed at continuing the present global economic system irrelevant. Not to mention that the system itself has crisis factors which the strengthening of the IMF does nothing about.
What was it about? Showing the public that something is being done, to stem panic. And they probably wanted to create some agreements, but the reality of their competing interests  prevented that. Another illustration of how the system is being overwhelmed by its own contradictions, including national interests in the context of an international system.
Logged
StrangeFire
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7057


It's not important until it is


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2009, 04:12:32 PM »

I don't think the average person really realizes what a big thing this is. It amounts to an alternative to the US Dollar and a blank check to print money. We may all look back on this as the moment the American Empire really fell.
Logged

Not, I'll not Carrion Comfort, Despair, not feast on thee...
Not untwist, slack they may be, these last strands of man in me...
Johnny Crash
Guest
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2009, 04:34:02 PM »

"In effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it."

Hehehe.  Yes, we do, prick.

But this is the real question:

"IMF rising. Will PO make this pointless?"

Do people think their govt's are PO unaware or not?
If their govt (and military and intelligence community) is unaware of PO and the general lack/scarcity of most resources now, well, that is some damn astounding ignorance on the politicians' part (which I can't entirely rule out).  They don't know the whole thing is about to fall apart and have not taken steps to prevent it.  The only recourse left to them would be war at some point.

Or, they are very aware of PO and the resultant societal chaos and potential mass extinction that could come to pass.  And they have made the requisite plans to deal with this situation, unpleasant as these plans may be to the likes of you or me.

Coke is buying out Pepsi.  Redundancies will be eliminated. 
What's so surprising? 
Logged
TravelsHopefully
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2299


Growing Zone 8a


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2009, 05:21:28 PM »

Do people think their govt's are PO unaware or not?
There are definitely people in Government that are PO aware. I don't believe that most of them are though.
Of the ones that are PO aware, some/many probably don't get the full implications - don't forget, many of these people have never had a real job - they are good at manipulating people, but their critical thinking skills are may be somewhat lacking.
Logged
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6987


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2009, 06:04:15 PM »

A wide assortment of people i've met, including lots of academics/students/staff on the Berkeley campus, especially in the engineering and sciences (and econ), as well as many left activists and media people, truly believe that human ingenuity will overcome any problem, and that Peak Oil is just another hype like the Millennium crash. They simply cannot fathom the depth of the problem, quite a few reiterated the refrain about the stone age not ending due to a lack of stones. So it shouldn't be surprising that government officials aren't fully aware either, they tend to be from this same background.
Logged
2handband
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1354


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2009, 06:18:38 PM »

A wide assortment of people i've met, including lots of academics/students/staff on the Berkeley campus, especially in the engineering and sciences (and econ), as well as many left activists and media people, truly believe that human ingenuity will overcome any problem, and that Peak Oil is just another hype like the Millennium crash. They simply cannot fathom the depth of the problem, quite a few reiterated the refrain about the stone age not ending due to a lack of stones. So it shouldn't be surprising that government officials aren't fully aware either, they tend to be from this same background.

I've spent my share of time in academic circles, long enough to have earned the right to be addressed as Dr. (although I never use it). And based on that I can tell you that the above really is the attitude of academia. My training is in the social sciences, but in academic life you find yourself associating with all kinds including physicists, biologists, chemists, etc. Almost all of these people really do see technology as the answer (when they say "human ingenuity" they really mean technological development). It's not a ploy to get government funding or anything like that, this is really the way these people think. It gives me a feeling of hopelessness to see our best and brightest, people with genius IQs and the best of educations, squandering all their talent on research that will almost certainly never come to anything.
Logged

Johnny Crash
Guest
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2009, 07:39:17 PM »

Quote
A wide assortment of people i've met, including lots of academics/students/staff on the Berkeley campus, especially in the engineering and sciences (and econ), as well as many left activists and media people, truly believe that human ingenuity will overcome any problem, and that Peak Oil is just another hype like the Millennium crash. They simply cannot fathom the depth of the problem, quite a few reiterated the refrain about the stone age not ending due to a lack of stones. So it shouldn't be surprising that government officials aren't fully aware either, they tend to be from this same background.

I would say most govt officials aren't academics of the techno utopian variety.  It seems like they are from law and business backgrounds.  But I could be wrong! 
Anyway, it's not about all politicians being ignorant or in the know, but the important ones sitting on important committees that are controlled by monied interests who are in the know (as much as their masters care to elucidate them). 
Logged
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6987


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2009, 07:46:02 PM »

I meant to include business under econ, and law students tend to be part of the same mindset. I myself was trained as an engineer, so i'm totally familiar with this techno-think you speak of, 2handband. One can see engineering students develop it more and more as they go through their academic "training".
Logged
Johnny Crash
Guest
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2009, 07:53:36 PM »

I didn't mean to nit-pick the econ issue.  Just meant to say that business types should have their ear closer to the ground so to speak.  Not being able to rely on grants, etc.
Logged
picasso moon
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6987


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2009, 08:01:09 PM »

People at the Business School are constantly getting grants from various corporate sources, at least at Berkeley (the Haas Business School, which used to have a main auditorium named after Arthur Anderson).
Logged
wordnerd
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8480


What???????


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2009, 08:07:15 PM »

From what I saw in my connection with the university, each person/section in acadameia seems to see their topic - and nothing else.
Most of them live mainly in an artificial world - and wear blinders regarding life outseide of their specialty .
Logged

Unless we change direction,
we are likely to end up
where we are headed

Chinese Proverb
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!